From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Indianapolis Car Exchange, Inc. v. Alderson
Indiana Court of Appeals
910 N.E.2d 802, 69 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 980 (2009)
Mike Thurman operated a used-car dealership with financing from Indianapolis Car Exchange (Indianapolis) (defendant). Indianapolis perfected its security interest by filing a financing statement. Bonnie Chrisman, the owner of another used-car dealership, purchased a truck from Thurman and sold it to customer Randall Alderson (plaintiff). Chrisman told Alderson that Thurman had mentioned having some sort of financial support from Danny Hockett, who was the owner of Indianapolis. Thurman failed to notify Indianapolis of the sale to Chrisman and did not make repayment, which was a requirement under Thurman’s financing agreement with Indianapolis. Indianapolis had the bureau of motor vehicles place a lien on the truck, and Alderson filed suit against Indianapolis. The lower court ruled in favor of Alderson, ordering the bureau of motor vehicles to remove the lien, and Indianapolis appealed. On appeal, the issue before the court was whether Chrisman and her customer, Alderson, qualified as buyers in the ordinary course of business. Indianapolis argued that neither Chrisman nor Alderson could be characterized as buyers in the ordinary course of business, because they knew that Indianapolis had a security interest in the vehicle Alderson purchased. However, in an affidavit, Chrisman explained that she was not aware of any specific details regarding Thurman’s financing and only knew that Thurman’s dealership was receiving some manner of support from Indianapolis.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Barnes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.