Indoe v. Dwyer
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division
424 A.2d 456 (1980)
Christine Dwyer (defendant) submitted an offer to purchase a house owned by William and Jane Indoe (plaintiffs) on behalf of herself and her husband John Dwyer (defendant), who was out of town at the time. The offer was accepted and a standard form contract was prepared by a realtor. Mrs. Dwyer signed the agreement, mistakenly believing it to be a bid rather than a binding contract. The effectiveness of the agreement was conditioned on approval by each party’s attorney, except with respect to price and financing terms. The Dwyers gave a copy of the agreement to their attorney who found numerous problems with it, regarding issues such as inspections, timing, and the conveyance of personal property. On those bases, the attorney notified the realtor that he was withholding approval of the contract and that the Dwyers would not purchase the property. The Indoes sued. Both parties submitted motions for summary judgment, which the trial court took under consideration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gaynor, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 153,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,400 briefs, keyed to 183 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.