Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Industrial Holographics, Inc. v. Donovan

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
722 F. 2d 1362 (7th Cir. 1983)


Facts

Industrial Holographics (Industrial) (plaintiff) manufactured machinery used to make rubber tires, and sought to hire an export manager in Michigan. Industrial submitted an application for labor certification for Roger K. Yu, an alien, for the export manager position. As part of the application, Industrial had to certify that it had complied with the various provisions of 20 C.F.R. 656, which among other things require an employer to post a job both internally and with a state employment service, and to advertise in newspapers. Additionally, § 656.21 requires that an employer advertise the job at the “prevailing wage” and “prevailing working conditions.” The Department of Labor denied Industrial’s application because Industrial had advertised the export manager salary at $1,000 per month, when the prevailing wage, as determined by the Michigan Employment Security Commission (MESC), was $1,666 per month. The MESC contacted five Michigan employers to determine the average wage for export managers, and come up with that sum. Industrial then tried to re-advertise the job at $1,666, but did not comply with all of the § 656.21 requirements; specifically, Industrial did not post the job internally. Thus, the labor certification was denied. On review within the Department of Labor, an administrative law judge (ALJ) affirmed the denial. Industrial sought review of the ALJ’s decision in district court. The district court granted summary judgment for the Department of Labor, holding that the Secretary of Labor had the authority to issue the advertising regulations at issue and the Department of Labor’s use of the prevailing wage standard was not arbitrary and capricious. Industrial appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cudahy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 251,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.