Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Barrett
Rhode Island Supreme Court
101 R.I. 89, 220 A.2d 517 (1966)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Arthur Tilley’s will placed his property into a trust for the benefit of his wife, Mary Tilley, during her lifetime. Arthur’s will named Industrial National Bank (the bank) as trustee and gave Mary a general testamentary power of appointment over any trust corpus remaining at her death. Mary’s will exercised the general testamentary power of appointment in favor of the bank, to hold the property in trust for the benefit of her granddaughters, Aline Lathan and Evelyn Barrett, or, if they died, for the benefit of their children. Mary’s will stated that the trust would terminate 21 years after the death of the last survivor of the granddaughters or issue of either granddaughter who was alive at the time of Mary’s death. At the time of Arthur’s death, both granddaughters and one great-grandchild were living. At the time of Mary’s death, both granddaughters and seven great-grandchildren were living. One great-grandchild was born after Mary’s death. The bank, as trustee, and Aline, as executor of Mary’s will (plaintiffs), brought an action seeking construction of Mary’s will, and Evelyn and others (defendants) responded. The bank and Aline argued that Mary’s exercise of the power of appointment created under Arthur’s will did not violate the rule against perpetuities because the perpetuity period should be counted from the date of Mary’s exercise of the power, rather than from the date of the power’s creation in Arthur’s will.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Paolino, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.