Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. Hodgson

499 F.2d 467 (1974)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. Hodgson

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
499 F.2d 467 (1974)

EC
Play video

Facts

The Industrial Union Department of the AFL-CIO (AFL-CIO) (plaintiff), a labor union, sued James Hodgson (defendant), the secretary of the Department of Labor (DOL), in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The AFL-CIO challenged: (1) the DOL's interpretation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), and (2) a rule the DOL implemented under OSHA to regulate asbestos dust in the workplace. Although OSHA specified general policy objectives and provided a procedure for setting standards, OSHA left most of the implementation details to the DOL. The DOL made extensive and highly technical fact findings in support of its asbestos rule. However, many issues required the DOL to make its own policy judgments. Two judgments made by the DOL were: (1) to give all industries the same target date for compliance with the rule, and (2) to require different retention periods under the rule for different types of records.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McGowan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Administrative Law

Key Terms