Information Systems and Networks Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
34 Fed. Cl. 457 (1995)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Information Systems and Networks Corporation (ISN) (plaintiff) subcontracted with the United States Air Force (government) (defendant) to convert the government’s existing PFORMS database onto a new mainframe computer. The government’s statement of work (SOW) required that the converted PFORMS system support multiple users. ISN used TSO/ISPF software for the conversion, which did not support multiple users. ISN delivered the converted PFORMS system to the government on time. The government notified ISN that the system was inadequate because it did not support multiple users. The government sent ISN a Show Cause Notice, demanding that ISN justify its failure to timely deliver an adequate PFORMS system or face default. Seven months later, after minimal communications with ISN, the government terminated ISN’s subcontract for default. ISN filed a breach-of-contract action under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), seeking to convert the default termination into a termination for the convenience of the government. ISN moved for partial summary judgment on liability, arguing that (1) the government’s design specifications required use of the TSO/ISPF software; (2) because TSO/ISPF does not support multiple users, the government’s design specifications made adequate performance impossible; and (3) the government waived its right to terminate ISN’s contract for default-in-delivery because it failed to terminate ISN’s contact within a reasonable timeframe. The government countered, arguing that (a) the government chose the TSO/ISPF software based on ISN’s advice; and (b) the Show Cause Notice clearly indicated that the government did not intend to waive its right to terminate ISN’s contract for default-in-delivery.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tidwell, III, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.