Ingram v. McCuiston

134 S.E.2d 705 (1964)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ingram v. McCuiston

North Carolina Supreme Court
134 S.E.2d 705 (1964)

Facts

Betty Pat Ingram (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident with Linda Lee McCuiston (defendant). Ingram brought a negligence suit against McCuiston. It was alleged that Ingram sustained a five percent permanent disability to her neck and thoracic spine in the accident and that she suffered from emotional problems due to the accident as well. Ingram’s orthopedic specialist, Dr. Miller, testified at trial in response to an extended hypothetical fact pattern supplied by Ingram’s attorney. The fact pattern involved Ingram’s history of emotional and physical health, as well as the circumstances of the accident, among other things. Included in the fact pattern were facts that were assumed, embellished, or even false, including that: (1) Ingram was in excellent physical and emotional health; (2) Ingram developed suicidal tendencies after the accident; (3) Ingram’s cervical spine and lumbar spine also became disabled; and (4) other irrelevant facts such as stories from Ingram’s childhood and her reason for being on the road the day of the accident. Dr. Miller stated in response to the fact pattern that the accident could have produced the physical and emotional conditions described, and that he was basing his testimony as to the emotional conditions on the separate testimony of Ingram’s psychiatrist, Dr. Wright. The trial court allowed the hypothetical fact pattern and Dr. Miller’s responses and found in favor of Ingram. McCuiston appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sharp, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 733,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 733,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership