Initiative and Referendum Institute v. Walker

450 F.3d 1082 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Initiative and Referendum Institute v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
450 F.3d 1082 (2006)

JC

Facts

While the Utah constitution allowed ballot initiatives on a simple majority basis, in 1998, the constitution was amended to require a two-thirds majority for any initiative ballot regarding wildlife. That particular amendment was adopted after a successful popular vote. Soon thereafter, a massive class of plaintiffs, including several politicians, other individuals, and six wildlife or animal advocacy groups, including the Initiative and Referendum Institute (collectively, the wildlife advocates) (plaintiffs), filed suit challenging Utah’s requirement of a supermajority for wildlife-related initiatives. The wildlife advocates alleged that the supermajority requirement violated their First Amendment rights and was overly broad. Specifically, the wildlife advocates argued that the supermajority requirement (1) burdened their freedom of speech, which should be considered under strict scrutiny; (2) burdened their freedom of expression, which should be considered under intermediate scrutiny; (3) was discriminatory in regard to viewpoint or content; and (4) was too broad and was facially invalid. Among other arguments advanced by the state (defendant) was that the supermajority requirement did not implicate the First Amendment in any way. At the trial-court level, the suit was dismissed on the merits, with a finding that the wildlife advocates’ claims did not present a First Amendment issue. The wildlife advocates appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McConnell, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Lucero, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership