Insolia v. Philip Morris, Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
186 F.R.D. 547 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Insolia, Mays, and Lovejoy (plaintiffs), former smokers diagnosed with lung cancer, brought suit against major cigarette manufacturers and tobacco industry trade organizations (defendants), claiming an industry-wide conspiracy to deceive customers about the dangers of smoking. The claims of the plaintiffs were joined pursuant to Rule 20 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendants filed a motion to sever the claims of the plaintiffs because the claims were not sufficiently similar. Specifically, the plaintiffs started to smoke at different ages; the plaintiffs smoked different brands of cigarettes; the plaintiffs quit for different reasons; and there is evidence that Mays contracted cancer due to a work-related accident unrelated to smoking.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Crabb, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
