InterChem Asia 2000 PTE. Ltd. v. Oceana Petrochemicals AG

373 F. Supp. 2d 340 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

InterChem Asia 2000 PTE. Ltd. v. Oceana Petrochemicals AG

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
373 F. Supp. 2d 340 (2005)

Facts

InterChem Asia 2000 PTE. Ltd. (InterChem) (plaintiff) and Oceana Petrochemicals AG (Oceana) (defendant) were parties to a contract that contained an arbitration clause. The arbitration clause provided that any disputes arising out of the contract shall be resolved by arbitration and that the American Arbitration Association (AAA) rules would apply. After a dispute arose, InterChem and Oceana went to arbitration. InterChem and Oceana submitted requests for attorney’s fees but did not explicitly authorize the arbitrator to impose such a sanction on the parties’ lawyers. Likewise, the arbitration clause and the AAA rules did not authorize the arbitrator to sanction the lawyers. The arbitrator sanctioned both Oceana and Oceana’s attorney, Richard DiDonna, for not timely producing documents during the arbitration. As a sanction, the arbitrator directed Oceana and DiDonna to pay InterChem’s legal fees. InterChem motioned the court to confirm the arbitration award. Oceana moved to vacate the sanction award.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Marrero, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership