Interior Trails Preservation Coalition v. Swope
Supreme Court of Alaska
115 P.3d 527 (2005)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Greg and Donna Swope (defendants) bought land near the Skyline Ridge Trail in 1997. The Swopes put up a barricade and a “no trespassing” sign when they saw numerous people crossing their property. In 2002, residents in the area formed a non-profit corporation, the Interior Trails Preservation Coalition (the Coalition) (plaintiff), to keep recreational trails open to the public. The Coalition sued the Swopes to establish a public prescriptive easement over the Swopes’ land, arguing that the public had used the land since the 1950s. The Swopes filed a motion to dismiss. The superior court granted the motion, ruling that (1) the Coalition did not have standing and (2) the Coalition had not been in existence long enough to satisfy the ten years of continuous use necessary to establish a prescriptive easement. The Coalition filed a motion for reconsideration, which was denied. The coalition then petitioned the Supreme Court of Alaska for review, which was granted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bryner, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.