Intermountain Broadcasting & Television Corp. v. Idaho Microwave, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Idaho
196 F. Supp. 315 (1961)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Idaho Microwave, Inc. (defendant) operated a community antenna service in Twin Falls, Idaho, which relayed broadcast television channels to a geographic area that could not otherwise pick them up. Idaho Microwave charged customers in Twin Falls for the relay service. Intermountain Broadcasting & Television Corporation (Intermountain) (plaintiff) operated a broadcast television channel out of Salt Lake City that did not reach the Twin Falls, Idaho area without a relay service like Idaho Microwave’s. Intermountain’s profits came from selling broadcasting time to sponsors. It did not charge customers, because its channel was broadcast freely and could be picked up by anyone with an antenna within range. Intermountain had a contract with another broadcast channel in the Twin Falls area called KLIX that allowed KLIX to rebroadcast Intermountain’s programming in exchange for a per-hour charge. Idaho Microwave began to relay Intermountain’s channel to Idaho Microwave’s customers without entering into any kind of agreement with Intermountain. Intermountain filed suit against Idaho Microwave claiming unjust enrichment and unfair competition on the grounds that Idaho Microwave had misappropriated the fruits of Intermountain’s money, skill, and labor. Intermountain filed a motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sweigert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.