International Casings Group, Inc. v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
358 F. Supp. 2d 863 (2005)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (PSF) (defendant) was a pork producer that sold hog casings. International Casings Group, Inc. (ICG) entered into two contracts to purchase hog casings from two of PSF’s facilities. Four years later, the two companies terminated these contracts. However, both companies continued to perform as they negotiated terms for two new contracts. These negotiations lasted for two years, occurring primarily through email messages that contained header information about the email’s source and frequently the author’s typed name. In June, the negotiators reached an agreement about the new contracts’ essential terms, which included a three-year duration and more than $500 in sales. The parties began operating under the new terms. However, for several months, the physical contracts sat with PSF’s president, awaiting signature. PSF then hired a new supervisor who did not like the new contracts’ terms. In November, well before the end of the three-year term, PSF ended its relationship with ICG. ICG sued PSF in federal court for breach of contract. ICG moved for a preliminary injunction to prevent PSF from selling the casings made at the two facilities to someone else while the case was pending. This motion required ICG to prove, in part, that ICG was likely to succeed on its breach-of-contract claims. The primary dispute was whether new binding contracts had been formed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laughrey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.