Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

International Harvester Co. v. Glendenning

Supreme Court of Texas
505 S.W.2d 320 (1974)


Facts

In the 1950s, Don Glendenning (defendant) owned an International Harvester dealership. Later, Glendenning worked as an International Harvester salesman before becoming a farmer and frequent trader of farm equipment. In 1971, Glendenning bought three tractors from Jack L. Barnes, another International Harvester dealer. Glendenning paid $16,000 in cash for all three, which were worth about $22,500. Barnes indicated in the order form and the bill of sale, which Glendenning signed, that in addition to the cash, Glendenning had traded in four other tractors valued at $8,700. Glendenning admitted that he traded in no tractors, that he knew a great deal about International Harvester’s floor-plan pricing method of supplying tractors to dealers and retaining a security interest, and that falsifying the transaction documents was likely to mislead International Harvester and other creditors. Nevertheless, when an International Harvester representative called Glendenning about the deal, he lied and affirmed that he had traded in the tractors. International Harvester Company and International Harvester Credit (International) (plaintiffs) sued Glendenning for wrongful conversion of the three tractors. Glendenning argued that damages were improper, because he was a buyer in the ordinary course of business. The jury agreed, and International appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.