International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research

799 F.2d 934 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
799 F.2d 934 (1986)

Facts

Alex Pacheco, the founder of several animal welfare organizations including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), volunteered when he was an undergraduate student to work for Dr. Edward Taub (defendant) at the Institute for Behavioral Research (IBR) in Maryland on a neurological study looking at the capacity of monkeys to learn to use a limb after nerves had been severed. Based on Pacheco and others’ observations of mistreatment of the monkeys in the study, Taub was charged and found guilty on six criminal counts of animal cruelty. Fearing that the monkeys could be returned to the IBR, Pacheco, PETA, and others filed a civil suit to require the Secretary of Agriculture to enforce provisions of the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) against Taub and the IBR. After an appellate court found that the state animal-cruelty laws did not apply to an institution—like IBR—conducting medical research pursuant to a federal program, the criminal charges against Taub were reversed. The civil case was dismissed, and Pacheco, PETA, and others appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wilkinson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership