International Stevedoring Co. v. Haverty

272 U.S. 50 (1926)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

International Stevedoring Co. v. Haverty

United States Supreme Court
272 U.S. 50 (1926)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Haverty (plaintiff) was a longshoreman employed by International Stevedoring Company (IS) (defendant). Haverty was injured while stowing freight in the hold of a docked vessel. The hatch tender, who was also employed by IS, negligently failed to warn that a load was about to be lowered, and Haverty was seriously hurt when the load came down. Haverty brought a personal-injury action in Washington state court to recover damages from IS. IS sought a ruling that Haverty and the hatch tender were fellow servants, which would preclude Haverty from recovering from IS under the common-law fellow-servant rule. Congress’s Act of June 5, 1920, c. 250, § 20 (the Jones Act) provided that seamen who suffered personal injuries in the course of employment could maintain an action for damages and that the statutes modifying or extending the common-law right or remedy in cases of personal injury to railroad employees applied to actions brought by seamen. The court ruled that if the hatch tender’s failure to warn proximately caused Haverty’s injury, a verdict had to be returned for Haverty. A verdict was returned in favor of Haverty, and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted IS’s petition for a writ of certiorari. IS argued that the case was governed by the admiralty law and that the admiralty law had adopted the common-law fellow-servant rule.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holmes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership