International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen v. Meese
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
616 F.Supp. 1387 (1985)
- Written by Christopher Bova, JD
Facts
Homestake Mining Company of California (defendant) started construction on a new gold mine in 1984. To address unique problems arising from the mine’s location, it purchased a new gold ore processing system from Diedier-Werke, a German company. The purchase agreement was contingent on Diedier-Werke installing the system on the project site. In September 1964, Diedier-Werke submitted “temporary visitor for business” visa petitions to the U.S. consulate in Bonn for its employees who were to install the system. The consulate approved the visas, relying on INS Operations Instruction 214.2(b)(5). After the German workers entered the country, the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen (plaintiff) sued the Attorney General, Secretary of State, and the INS to declare that Operations Instruction 214.2(b)(5) violated the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 and enjoin them from issuing visas under that instruction. Homestake intervened as an interested party.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Legge, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.