Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis

14 F.3d 133, 1994 AMC 2704 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. v. Sammis

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
14 F.3d 133, 1994 AMC 2704 (1994)

AR

Facts

Interport Pilots Agency, Inc. (Interport) (plaintiff) represented sailing pilots licensed by the State of Connecticut. The Board of Commissioners of Pilots of the State of New York (board) (defendant) had a policy that excluded Connecticut-licensed pilots from assignments aboard ships seeking to navigate to and from New York ports on Long Island Sound. Interport sued the board, seeking to recognize its pilotage rights under the Federal Boundary Waters Act. Under the act, a vessel operating within the boundary waters between two states could hire a pilot from either of those states to pilot the vessel to ports in either state. The district court found that Long Island Sound was a boundary water covered by the act and that vessels could hire Connecticut pilots to land at New York ports on Long Island Sound. The board appealed, arguing that Long Island Sound was uniquely dangerous and the use of Connecticut pilots would be hazardous to navigation and the environment unless Connecticut pilots got a special endorsement to pilot those waters.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jacobs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership