Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt

1980 I.C.J. 73 (Advisory Opinion of Dec. 20, 1980)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt

International Court of Justice
1980 I.C.J. 73 (Advisory Opinion of Dec. 20, 1980)

Facts

In 1951 Egypt (defendant) entered into a host-state agreement with the World Health Organization (WHO) (plaintiff) for the regional WHO office to be located in Alexandria, Egypt. When Egypt entered into a peace agreement with Israel several years later, some members of the WHO sought to have the regional WHO office moved from Egypt to another country in the region. The WHO submitted a request to the International Court of Justice for guidance on the legal principles and rules applicable to the WHO and Egypt under the host-state agreement with regard to moving the regional office away from Egypt. The International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 829,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership