Interprofession du Gruyère v. U.S. Dairy Export Council

61 F.4th 407 (2023)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Interprofession du Gruyère v. U.S. Dairy Export Council

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
61 F.4th 407 (2023)

Facts

Gruyere cheese originated in the Gruyère region of Switzerland and France and was made using milk from cows that grazed on alpine grasses. Both Switzerland and France approved protected designations for the term gruyere so that the term’s use on a food product guaranteed that the product originated in the Gruyère region. No comparable designation existed in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration had issued a standard of identity for gruyere cheese, but the standard did not impose any geographic restrictions on the cheese’s production. Consequently, much of the cheese sold in the United States under the gruyere label originated in the United States or foreign countries other than Switzerland and France. Believing that the term gruyere should be used only to refer to cheese originating from the Gruyère region, French consortium Syndicat Interprofessionel du Gruyère and Swiss consortium Interprofession du Gruyère (the consortiums) (plaintiffs) filed an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the word gruyere as a certification mark that would certify that cheese labeled as gruyere originated in the Gruyère region. The U.S. Dairy Export Council and Intercibus, Inc. (collectively, the opposers) (defendants) opposed registration of gruyere as a certification mark. They argued that United States consumers understood the term gruyere to refer to a type of cheese, not the cheese’s place of origin. They therefore claimed that the term gruyere was generic and thus ineligible for registration as a certification mark. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board agreed and denied registration. The district court upheld that determination, granting summary judgment in the opposers’ favor. The consortiums appealed to the Fourth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gregory, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership