Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States

306 U.S. 208, 59 S. Ct. 467, 83 L.Ed. 610 (1939)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States

United States Supreme Court

306 U.S. 208, 59 S. Ct. 467, 83 L.Ed. 610 (1939)

Play video

Facts

Interstate Circuit, Inc. (Interstate) (defendant) and Texas Consolidated Theaters (Consolidated) were movie-theater companies that dominated the market for showing films in various Texas cities. Interstate and Consolidated entered into agreements with eight independent companies that distributed 75 percent of all first-run films to U.S. theaters. The agreements specified the terms on which the theaters owned by Interstate and Consolidated would show the films. A letter written by O’Donnell, Interstate’s manager, made two demands as a condition of Interstate’s continued agreement to show a particular distributor’s films: (1) that the distributor agree that on subsequent runs it would not permit its films to be shown in theaters charging an admission price of less than 25 cents and (2) that the distributor agree not to permit its first-run films to be shown on a double-bill with another feature film. O’Donnell’s letter to each distributor listed all of the distributors who were receiving the document. Subsequently, each distributor agreed with O’Donnell’s demands. The trial court found that the distributors had agreed and conspired with one another to take uniform action with respect to O’Donnell’s demands and thus violated § 1 of the Sherman Act. Interstate appealed to the United States Supreme Court from the trial court's final decree.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 605,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 605,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership