Interstate Natural Gas Association of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Authority

617 F.3d 504 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Authority

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
617 F.3d 504 (2010)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

The Natural Gas Act (NGA) authorized the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (defendant) to deregulate the natural-gas sales market. FERC Order No. 636 required natural-gas pipelines to unbundle sales and transportation services. In this order, FERC capped the purchase price for capacity releases at the same maximum rates as the rates for capacity sales by pipelines. FERC expressed concern that the pipelines could wield market power to command higher prices if given increased pricing flexibility. FERC also explained that market-based rates in the short-term market might tempt pipelines to limit construction of new pipeline capacity in order to charge higher prices. Later, FERC issued a final rule, Order No. 712, which lifted the price ceilings for short-term capacity releases by natural-gas shippers but not for capacity sales by natural-gas pipelines, as set by Order No. 636. FERC found that the short-term capacity-release market for selling natural-gas supply was generally competitive but that price ceilings were still necessary to ensure pipelines that provided natural-gas transportation services did not take advantage of customers. The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America; Spectra Energy Transmission, LLC; and Spectra Energy Partners, LP (plaintiffs) filed petitions for review of Order No. 712 in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership