From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Ionics, Inc. v. Elmwood Sensors, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
110 F.3d 184 (1997)
Ionics, Inc. (Ionics) (plaintiff) manufactured water dispensers. On several occasions, Ionics purchased thermostats from Elmwood Sensors, Inc. (Elmwood) (defendant) to place in the water dispensers. For each purchase, Ionics sent Elmwood a purchase order setting forth terms and conditions, including a term describing the remedies available to Ionics in the event of breach. Ionics notified Elmwood that unless Elmwood objected to Ionics's terms in writing, Ionics would assume that Elmwood agreed to the terms. After receiving each purchase order, Elmwood sent Ionics an “acknowledgement” form setting out Elmwood's own terms and conditions. One of Elmwood's terms limited its liability for damages resulting from use of its thermostats and stated that the purchaser's only remedy would be repair of defective products. Elmwood stated that this language constituted a “counteroffer” that would be deemed to have been accepted by Ionics unless rejected in writing within 10 days. Several of Elmwood’s thermostats placed in Ionics’s water dispensers malfunctioned and caught fire, causing damage to Ionics’s customers. Ionics brought suit in federal district court against Elmwood, seeking to recover damages. Elmwood argued that Ionics had accepted Elmwood's limitation of liability in the acknowledgement form. Elmwood moved for partial summary judgment, but the district court denied Elmwood's motion. The district court certified the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to determine if the court's decision was proper under Massachusetts's statutory version of UCC § 2-207.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 518,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 518,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.