IOTA XI Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity v. George Mason University
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
993 F.2d 386 (1993)
Facts
The IOTA XI Chapter of Sigma Chi Fraternity (the fraternity) (plaintiff) was a student organization at George Mason University (defendant). The fraternity held an annual Derby Days event on campus to raise money for charity and entertain fellow students. The fraternity held an “ugly woman contest” as part of the Derby Days events. The contest was held on campus and involved members of the fraternity dressing as caricatures of different types of women. One particular member dressed as an offensive caricature of an African American woman. The contest was intended as satire and humor. Yet, numerous students complained that the event was offensive, and the fraternity apologized. University administrators believed that the fraternity’s conduct sent an improper message that racial and sexual issues should be taken lightly and that this was contrary to the university’s mission of promoting diversity. The university sanctioned the fraternity, banning all activities for the remainder of the school year and implementing a two-year ban on certain social activities. The fraternity filed a lawsuit against the university, alleging that its First Amendment rights had been violated. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the fraternity, and the university appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sprouse, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 709,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
