Ireland v. Smith

542 N.W.2d 344 (1995)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ireland v. Smith

Michigan Court of Appeals
542 N.W.2d 344 (1995)

Facts

Jennifer Ireland (plaintiff) and Steven Smith (defendant) were the 16-year-old parents of a daughter, Maranda, who was born in April 1991. Jennifer and Steven never lived together. Jennifer and Maranda lived with Jennifer’s mother and sister, who helped her raise Maranda, while Steven lived with his parents. Steven did not visit with Maranda for the first year of her life but visited her regularly after that. In 1993, Jennifer and Maranda moved to Ann Arbor, where Jennifer was attending the University of Michigan. Maranda attended a university-approved daycare while Jennifer was in class. In 1993, Jennifer sought child support from Steven, and after that, Steven sought custody of Maranda. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that there was an established custodial environment with Jennifer. However, the trial court transferred custody to Steven, finding that of the 12 factors enumerated in Michigan’s Child Custody Act, all were neutral except for one, which favored Steven. The trial court reasoned that Jennifer would be unable to be a full-time student and care for Maranda and, moreover, that it would be preferable for Maranda to be cared for by her paternal grandparents than to attend daycare. Jennifer appealed, and Steven cross-appealed, challenging the trial court’s findings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gribbs, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership