Ireland v. United Kingdom

1976 Y.B. Eur. Conv. on H.R. 512, 748, 750, 792, 794 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ireland v. United Kingdom

European Commission of Human Rights
1976 Y.B. Eur. Conv. on H.R. 512, 748, 750, 792, 794 (1976)

Facts

In the 1970s, British forces detained and interrogated individuals in Northern Ireland. The British troops used a combination of five techniques during the detention and interrogation: the troops (1) forced detainees to stand against a wall for several hours, (2) kept black hoods over detainees’ heads at all times except during interrogations, (3) subjected detainees to constant loud hissing noises, (4) deprived detainees of sleep pending interrogations, and (5) deprived detainees of adequate food and drink. The Government of Ireland (plaintiff) brought a complaint against the Government of the United Kingdom (defendant) before the European Commission of Human Rights (the commission), asserting that the British troops’ interrogation practices violated Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits the use of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership