Ireland v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
621 F.2d 731 (1980)
- Written by Heather Ryfa, JD
Facts
Charles Ireland (plaintiff) was a shareholder employed as chairman of the Board of Directors of Vulcan Material Company (Vulcan), whose principal office was located in Birmingham, Alabama. Ireland moved to Lynn Haven, Florida in 1965, largely due to a personal conflict with the president of Vulcan, but continued to work for the company from his home. Vulcan provided its airplanes at no charge for Ireland’s travel from Florida to Birmingham, and occasionally Ireland’s family accompanied Ireland on the flights. The Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed additional income to Ireland for the estimated value of the plane rides because an economic benefit—such as personal commuting expenses—given to a shareholder was a constructive dividend. The amount assessed was based on the cost of the airplanes to Vulcan. Ireland paid the tax but then sued for a refund in federal district court, arguing that the flights were not taxable income to him because his decision to move to Florida was for business rather than personal reasons, which meant that his plane trips from Florida to Alabama were for the benefit of Vulcan rather than personal commuting expenses. Ireland also argued that the value of the flights should be based on the fair market value cost of private charter flights rather than the cost to Vulcan. The district court denied the refund and determined that the amount of tax assessed based on the cost of the flights to Vulcan was correct. Ireland filed an appeal, challenging the district court’s treatment of the flights’ value as taxable income and the court’s valuation of the flights.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ainsworth, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.