Irizarry v. United States
United States Supreme Court
128 S.Ct. 2198 (2008)
Irizzary (defendant) pled guilty to federal criminal charges. A presentence report recommended a sentence at the high end of federal sentencing guidelines based on enhancements related to the defendant’s conduct. Irizarry objected to the recommended enhancements. The trial court heard testimony from various witnesses and the judge issued an oral sentencing decision. The judge concluded that the highest recommendation under the sentencing guidelines was not appropriate in light of Irizarry’s conduct and imposed the more stringent maximum sentence authorized by statute. Irizarry appealed his conviction on the ground that Rule 32(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure required advance notice to the defendant any time that the court was considering imposing a sentence outside the parameters of the sentencing guidelines. The court of appeals concluded that the trial court’s deviation from the guidelines was a “variance” from the guidelines as opposed to a “departure” from the guidelines and therefore did not require advance notice under Rule 32(h). The court of appeals affirmed Irizarry’s sentence. Irizarry petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.