Irvington General Hospital v. Department of Health

374 A.2d 49 (1977)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Irvington General Hospital v. Department of Health

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
374 A.2d 49 (1977)

Facts

Irvington General Hospital (Irvington) (plaintiff) applied to the New Jersey Department of Health (the department) (defendant) for a certificate of need that would allow it to build an addition with 19 new surgical beds. Under state law, the department was required to consider six factors in evaluating a certificate-of-need application, including (1) the availability of substitute services or facilities and (2) the need for special services or equipment in a particular area. Irvington primarily served a town with a high density of elderly patients whose medical needs included having family and friends nearby for support during hospital stays. If Irvington lacked capacity, the nearest alternative hospital options required traveling outside the town into high-crime areas with poor public transportation. After the application hearing was delayed due to issues on both sides, the hearing officer recommended granting Irvington’s application. However, before the recommendation was heard by the department’s approval board, the board approved a different hospital’s application to reclassify 150 long-term beds as surgical beds. This other hospital served a different population, but both hospitals were in the same county. When the board received the recommendation to grant Irvington’s application, the board noted that there were now 150 more surgical beds than when the hearing officer had made the recommendation. The board remanded the issue to the officer to reconsider in light of the extra beds. At the rehearing, because there was now an excess number of surgical beds in the county, the hearing officer recommended denying Irvington’s application to build its new addition. Irvington appealed the denial to the state superior court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership