Isiah B. v. State

500 N.W.2d 637 (1993)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Isiah B. v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court
500 N.W.2d 637 (1993)

Facts

In 1990 Madison High School in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, began having problems with guns on campus. In just over one month, the school had to investigate five or six incidents involving guns at the school. For example, one Friday evening after a football game, students were shot at. Also, a riot nearly occurred when gunshots rang out one Saturday evening as students were leaving a school dance. The following Monday, tensions at the school were high because there were rumors that a shootout would occur that day at school. Due to the substantial risk of imminent harm to the students, school officials conducted random searches of student lockers. Milwaukee’s public school system had a handbook that contained a written policy providing that the school system owned the school lockers and could inspect them as deemed necessary. In fact, the schools had master keys for the lockers, and students were not allowed to use their own private locks on their school lockers. Parents and students were given the policy. Isiah B. (plaintiff) had a gun and cocaine inside a coat pocket in his locker, which security personnel found during the random search. Later, a petition to adjudicate Isiah as a delinquent child was filed, citing possession of a firearm on school grounds and possession of cocaine with the intention to deliver the drug. Isiah filed a motion in circuit court to suppress both the gun and the cocaine as the fruit of an unlawful search. The circuit court rejected the motion and rendered a judgment of delinquency. Isiah appealed, alleging that school officials violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Wisconsin’s constitution by randomly searching his school locker. The state (defendant) argued that there was no search for Fourth Amendment purposes, because Isiah did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the school locker.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Steinmetz, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership