ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. First City Capital Corp.

737 S.W.2d 803 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. First City Capital Corp.

Texas Supreme Court
737 S.W.2d 803 (1987)

Facts

First City National Bank (the Bank), First City Capital Corporation (FCCC) (defendant), and ITT Diversified Corporation (ITT) (plaintiff) held liens in the same personal property owned by Sisco Enterprises. The Bank obtained its lien first, FCCC obtained its lien second, and ITT obtained its lien third. Subsequently, the Bank entered into a subordination agreement with ITT in which the Bank agreed to subordinate its interest in some of Sisco Enterprises’ personal property to ITT’s interest so ITT could lend money to Sisco Enterprises. Sisco Enterprises failed to repay ITT, so ITT brought a foreclosure action regarding its interest. Sisco Enterprises’ personal property was sold in a foreclosure sale. FCCC claimed entitlement to the proceeds of the foreclosure sale and argued that its second lien had priority over ITT’s third lien. The trial court ruled in FCCC’s favor despite the subordination agreement between the Bank and ITT. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling based on a case involving real property. ITT appealed and argued that it had priority over FCCC pursuant to the subordination agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gonzalez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership