From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Ivan Allen Co. v. United States
United Stated Supreme Court
422 U.S. 617 (1975)
Facts
Ivan Allen Company (Ivan) (plaintiff) was a corporation engaged in selling furniture and equipment. Among its various securities, Ivan owned listed common stock and listed convertible debentures of Xerox Corporation that had been purchased with earnings and profits. During 1965 and 1966, the fair market value of both the common stock and debentures increased significantly. Ivan’s undistributed earnings for each of these two years was over $2.2 million. By including the fair market value (which included the cost plus the unrealized appreciation) of the Xerox securities in Ivan’s net liquid assets, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) determined, pursuant to § 533(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, that Ivan had allowed its earnings and profits in 1965 and 1966 to accumulate beyond its reasonable and reasonably anticipated business needs for the purpose of avoiding income tax with respect to its shareholders. The Commissioner therefore assessed an accumulated-earnings tax. Ivan argued that it was the cost rather than the fair market value of the Xerox securities that should have been used to determine Ivan’s net liquid assets. The district court held in Ivan’s favor, but the court of appeals reversed. Ivan appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
Dissent
What to do next…
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
