Ivanhoe Canal Corp. v. Bunn

694 So. 2d 263 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ivanhoe Canal Corp. v. Bunn

Louisiana Court of Appeal
694 So. 2d 263 (1995)

Facts

Texaco, Inc. (defendant) held an 80-year lease for a tract of land located on the Ivanhoe Canal. From that tract of land, the Ivanhoe Canal traveled through another parcel of land known as the Milling Tract, and then through other waterways and eventually to the Gulf of Mexico. Texaco built a marine base on the land it had leased and used it as a base of operations for Texaco vessels working in gas and oil production fields in the gulf. In order to use this base, Texaco vessels needed to travel along the Ivanhoe Canal through the Milling Tract, back and forth to the gulf. Texaco previously had a servitude of passage to use the canal through the Milling Tract but eventually acquired an undivided co-ownership interest in the Milling Tract and continued to use the canal through the tract under its rights as a co-owner. Texaco was one of ten co-owners of the Milling Tract, including private individuals and corporate entities. One of the other co-owners, Ivanhoe Canal Corporation, Inc. (ICC) (plaintiff) brought a suit against the other co-owners, seeking a partition of the Milling Tract. The trial judge granted judgment in ICC’s favor. Texaco appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fogg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership