Ivey v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
486 S.W. 3d 846 (2016)
Alfred Ivey, Jr. (defendant) was charged with rape of a minor. The rape resulted in a child, and the Commonwealth of Kentucky (plaintiff) introduced a DNA paternity test into evidence. The paternity test involved three steps. First, the examiner compared 15 locations on the child’s and Ivey’s DNA to see whether Ivey could be excluded as a potential parent. The examiner found matches between the DNA at all 15 locations, so Ivey was not excluded. The examiner next calculated a paternity index, which measured the likelihood that a union between Ivey and the child’s biological mother would produce a child with the child’s DNA markers. Ivey’s paternity index indicated that Ivey was 11,900,000 times more likely to be the father than a randomly selected male of the same race. The third step in the test calculated Ivey’s probability of paternity, based on his prior probability of paternity combined with the paternity index. The prior probability of paternity indicates the probability, prior to DNA testing, of the potential father being the child’s biological father. In general, this prior probability can vary based on factors including the potential father’s access to the child’s biological mother, the parties’ fertility, and the date of conception. However, in criminal cases, a standard prior probability of 50 percent is used to calculate a defendant’s probability of paternity. Using that 50 percent prior-probability figure, Ivey’s probability of paternity was 99.9999 percent. Even using much lower prior probabilities in the calculation, Ivey’s probability of paternity always exceeded 99.99 percent. Ivey was convicted, and he appealed to the Kentucky Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.