From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Izazaga v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
815 P.2d 304 (1991)
Javier Valle Izazaga (defendant) was charged with forcible rape and kidnapping. The prosecution (plaintiff) issued discovery requests to Izazaga pursuant to California’s Proposition 115, which required reciprocal discovery in criminal cases, permitting the prosecution to issue certain discovery requests prior to trial. Specifically, Proposition 115 permitted the prosecution to request (1) names and addresses of the witnesses a defendant planned to call at trial and (2) statements of those witnesses. Izazaga objected to the requests, but the superior court issued an order compelling discovery. The court of appeal affirmed. The California Supreme Court issued a writ of mandate to consider Izazaga’s claim that Proposition 115 violated his constitutional right against self-incrimination.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lucas, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.