J. Grant Farms Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
49 T.C.M. (CCH) 1197 (1985)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
James and Jean Grant owned and operated J. Grant Farms, Inc. (plaintiffs). James served as the corporation’s sole manager under an employment contract requiring him to devote his full-time energy, skills, and effort to the business and to reside on the farm premises in housing provided and paid for by the corporation. The farm’s operations were complex, involving crop planning, equipment maintenance, planting, cultivation, harvesting, drying, storage, and selling of corn and soybeans, as well as breeding, farrowing, and selling hogs. Both the grain-drying and swine operations required around-the-clock monitoring, particularly during drying and farrowing seasons. Moreover, valuable farm equipment was stored on-site. The Grants did not report the fair rental value of the housing or the cost of utilities paid by the corporation on their federal income tax returns. Similarly, the corporation deducted related depreciation and utility expenses. The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) assessed deficiencies, determining that the Grants received taxable income equal to the fair rental value of the residence plus utilities, and denied the corporation’s deductions. The Grants and the corporation petitioned the tax court for a redetermination, arguing that James was required to live on the farm to fulfill his employment duties and maximize profits. Experts testified that a resident manager was necessary and desirable on farms with grain-drying operations and expensive equipment to ensure efficient operation, security, and profitability. Even the commissioner’s expert conceded that a resident manager improved efficiency.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goffe, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

