From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
J.N.A. Realty Corp. v. Cross Bay Chelsea, Inc.
Court of Appeals of New York
366 N.E.2d 1313 (1977)
J.N.A. Realty Corp. (JNA) (plaintiff) leased commercial property to a restaurant for a 10-year term, with an option to renew for another 10-year term. The lease required the restaurant to inform JNA at least six months prior to the end of the lease term if it wished to exercise the option. Cross Bay Chelsea, Inc. (Chelsea) (defendant) offered to buy the lease, under the condition that the option be modified to be a 24-year term. JNA agreed to modify the option as requested. All other terms of the lease remained unchanged. Chelsea purchased the lease, as well as some fixtures and chattels then existing on the property. Chelsea began to occupy the premises and made improvements upon the property. During Chelsea’s tenancy, JNA regularly reminded Chelsea in writing of its obligations under the lease. One such letter was sent two weeks prior to the time the option was set to expire, but made no mention of the option. JNA eventually informed Chelsea shortly before the end of the lease term that the option had expired and that Chelsea would need to vacate the premises at the end of the lease term. Chelsea then provided notice of its intention to renew the lease, but JNA refused to honor the renewal notice. After the lease term expired, JNA brought a holdover action to recover the premises from Chelsea. The trial court held that Chelsea was entitled to equitable relief, and the appellate term affirmed. JNA appealed to the Appellate Division, which reversed the trial court's judgment. Chelsea appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wachtler, J.)
Dissent (Breitel, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.