Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

J.R. Hale Contracting Company v. United New Mexico Bank at Albuquerque

Supreme Court of New Mexico
799 P.2d 581 (1990)


Facts

Over an 11-year period, United New Mexico Bank at Albuquerque (United) (defendant) extended numerous lines of credit to J.R. Hale Contracting Company, Inc. (Hale) (plaintiff). Although Hale was often late in making payments, United declined to take any adverse action other than occasionally contacting Hale to request the overdue payments. In November 1982, United extended a $400,000 loan to Hale. The loan note required one interest payment to be made by March 1, 1983, and provided that, upon any past due payments, United was entitled to exercise its right to accelerate payment of the entire balance without notice to Hale. The following year, Hale met with United several times to discuss the possibility of borrowing additional funds. Although Hale failed to make the interest payment, United did not remind Hale about the payment during the meetings. Hale was not notified of United’s intention to exercise the right to accelerate payment until March 24, when United gave Hale a letter demanding immediate payment of the entire balance. The notice provided that United had chosen to accelerate because Hale had failed to make the interest payment and because United had concerns about Hale’s overall ability to make payments on the note. Hale filed suit against United, claiming wrongful acceleration. The trial court granted a directed verdict in United’s favor based on the explicit language of the note. Hale appealed, arguing that United’s conduct invalidated the terms of the note.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Ransom, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.