Supreme Court of Alaska
50 P.3d 388 (2002)
Jack (plaintiff), an Indian, was convicted of five counts of sexual abuse against his sons Avery, Lyle, and Carl. In response, the State of Alaska (defendant) sought to termination of Jack’s parental rights. Five experts testified, and each reached the conclusion that it was in all the boys’ best interests to remain with their foster families. The boys suffered from depression and post-traumatic stress disorder due to the abuse perpetrated by Jack. The experts testified that it would be to the boys’ detriment if they were reunited with Jack. An expert also testified that Jack’s rate of recidivism, or his propensity to repeat criminal behavior, was over 50 percent. The superior court found that Jack’s parental rights should be terminated. Jack appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carpeneti, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.