Jachimek v. Superior Court

169 Ariz. 317 (1991)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
J
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jachimek v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court
169 Ariz. 317 (1991)

Facts

William Jachimek (plaintiff) owned a building in Phoenix, Arizona that he wanted to lease for use as a pawn shop. The building was zoned commercial C-2, a zone in which pawn shops were ordinarily permitted. However, the City of Phoenix (the city) had passed an ordinance creating a so-called inebriate district in the area where Jachimek’s building was located. The ordinance required owners to obtain use permits for pawn shops, alcohol sales, blood banks, and similar uses that would otherwise be permitted in a C-2 district. The city denied Jachimek’s application for a use permit, and Jachimek sued to have the ordinance declared invalid. The trial court upheld the ordinance, reasoning that the city had the statutory power to create a unique zoning district. The court of appeals declined to review the matter, and Jachimek appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court. Jachimek argued that the ordinance impermissibly treated property in the inebriate district differently than it treated C-2 property in other areas of the city.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gordon, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 787,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 787,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Land Use

Key Terms