Jackson v. Indiana
United States Supreme Court
406 U.S. 715 (1972)
Jackson (defendant) was a deaf mute with the mental capacity of a pre-school aged child. Jackson was charged with criminal offenses relating to two petty robberies. The trial court conducted a competency hearing. The examining doctors concluded that Jackson was unable to understand the nature of the proceedings against him or to participate in his own defense. The doctors opined that it was highly unlikely Jackson would ever develop the communication skills necessary to render him competent to stand trial. The trial court ordered Jackson committed to a mental institution until such time as he was found sane. Jackson moved for a new trial on grounds that there was no evidence that he was insane and no evidence that he would ever become competent to stand trial. Jackson argued that the commitment amounted to a life sentence in the absence of a criminal conviction which violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Blackmun, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.