Supreme Court of New York
1 Johns. 424 (1804)
In 1800, Nancy Jackson (plaintiff) and Archibald Jackson (defendant) were married. Three years later, Nancy wanted a divorce. Nancy could not obtain a divorce in New York, and thus she traveled to nearby Vermont. In her divorce petition, Nancy alleged that she could no longer live with Archibald, because he was physically abusive and quick-tempered. The Supreme Court of Vermont granted Nancy a divorce and ordered that Archibald pay her $1,500 in alimony. Nancy then returned to New York and brought suit against Archibald. Nancy requested that the Supreme Court of New York acknowledge the Vermont divorce decree and order Archibald to pay the alimony owed to her. Archibald objected. Archibald urged the Supreme Court of New York to decline to enforce the judgment, because to do so would be inconsistent with the public policy of New York.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Spencer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.