Jackson v. O'Connell

177 N.E.2d 194 (1961)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jackson v. O'Connell

Illinois Supreme Court
177 N.E.2d 194 (1961)

Play video

Facts

Three sisters, Anna Duffy, Nellie Duffy and Katherine O’Connell, were grantees as joint tenants of a conveyance of real property. Nellie conveyed her interest in the property by deed to Anna. Anna Duffy died leaving a will that bequeathed her interest in the property in equal shares to four nieces (plaintiffs). The nieces brought suit against Katherine O’Connell (defendant), the last surviving sister, to partition the property. The nieces argued that Nellie Duffy’s deed severed the original joint tenancy entirely, leaving O’Connell with only a one-third interest as a tenant in common. Under the nieces’ theory, Anna Duffy would be the owner of an undivided two-thirds interest in the property as a tenant in common at the time of her death. O’Connell argued that Nellie Duffy’s deed only severed the joint tenancy the sisters shared with respect to Nellie’s one-third interest, thereby making Anna Duffy the owner of a one-third interest as a tenant in common and the owner of an additional undivided two-thirds interest in joint tenancy during her lifetime. At Anna’s death, O’Connell argued, the two-thirds interest vested entirely in O’Connell, leaving only Anna’s one-third tenant in common interest to pass as an asset of her estate. The probate court agreed with O’Connell and held that each of the four nieces thereby inherited a one-twelfth interest in the property. The nieces appealed and the court of appeals affirmed the probate decree. The nieces petitioned the supreme court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Klingbiel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership