Jackson v. Richard's 5 & 10 Inc.

433 A.2d 888 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jackson v. Richard’s 5 & 10 Inc.

Pennsylvania Superior Court
433 A.2d 888 (1981)

Play video

Facts

Richard’s 5 & 10 Inc. (Richard’s) (defendant) owned multiple stores operating under the name REO Discount Stores (REO). Herbert Jackson (plaintiff), who managed two stores, reached an oral agreement to purchase the inventory, fixtures, and goodwill of those stores from Richard’s. The parties memorialized their agreement on January 30, 1975, setting February 18 as the closing date. One of Jackson’s two down-payment checks bounced, and Jackson failed to appear at closing. On February 28, 1975, the parties entered a second written agreement setting March 31 as the new closing date. As a down payment, the new contract required Jackson to pay $2,000 in cash and execute a deed to his house that Richard’s would file if Jackson defaulted on the contract. The contract also contained some express conditions that required Jackson to submit proof that he paid off certain relatively minor debts and filed for a Small Business Administration loan. Jackson never submitted such proof, and Richard’s ultimately seized the stores, sold merchandise, and recorded the deed to Jackson’s house. Jackson filed a suit in equity against Richard’s, seeking an injunction preventing the transfer or encumbrance of Jackson’s home. Jackson argued that his breach of the contract was not material and the forfeiture of his home was therefore unjust. The trial court disagreed, denying Jackson’s requested injunction and ordering him to pay Richard’s $10,000 in damages. Jackson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cercone, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership