Jackson v. University of New Haven
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
228 F. Supp. 2D 156 (2002)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
James Jackson (plaintiff) was an experienced minor-league professional football coach who had never coached college football. When the University of New Haven (UNH) (defendant) lost its head football coach to a job in the National Football League, Jackson applied for the vacant head-coaching position. When the job was posted, UNH specifically indicated that college-coaching experience was required. UNH received 36 applications, and a search committee then chose six applicants to interview, eventually hiring Darren Rizzi, a former UNH assistant coach. Jackson was African American, whereas all six finalists for the job were White (and had college-coaching experience). Jackson filed a civil-rights suit against UNH, alleging racial discrimination in the hiring process in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Jackson made claims on disparate-treatment and disparate-impact theories. The disparate-treatment theory posited that the discrimination was intentional, whereas the disparate-impact theory argued that a facially neutral requirement (prior college coaching experience) still had a discriminatory impact. UNH filed a motion to dismiss the suit, arguing that Jackson did not meet the qualifications for employment and failed to make a prima facie case of disparate impact from the prior college-coaching-experience qualification. To prevail on a disparate-treatment claim, Jackson must show that he (1) is a member of a protected class, (2) was qualified for the employment, (3) had an adverse employment decision, and (4) had circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. Although points 1 and 3 were conceded, point 2 was deeply argued. Jackson maintained that his minor-league coaching experience should have qualified him, whereas UNH maintained that a college coach who could ensure National Collegiate Athletic Association compliance was necessary. On a disparate-impact basis, Jackson argued the lack of African-American coaches in college football and at UNH, which UNH argued did not make a prima facie case. UNH filed a motion to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Droney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

