Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Jacobs v. CBS Broadcasting

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
291 F.3d 1173 (2002)


Facts

Michael Givens (plaintiff) was a television script writer and a member of the Writer’s Guild of America (WGA). He worked with Westwind Releasing Corporation (Westwind) (plaintiff) to sell a script Givens wrote entitled “The Fourth Estate a/k/a/ Final Edition” to a television network. CBS Broadcasting (defendant) eventually bought the script. As part of the purchase agreement, William Webb (plaintiff) and Mike Jacobs, Jr. (plaintiff) would receive credit as executive producers and Givens would receive credit as a writer pursuant to the WGA’s rules regarding credit for writers. CBS eventually produced a show entitled “Early Edition,” which had a similar premise as “Final Edition.” Givens, Jacobs, and Webb were not named in the proposed credits for “Early Edition.” Givens appealed the credit decision to the WGA, which undertook an investigation to determine whether Givens’ participation was sufficient to warrant credit under its rules. WGA informed Givens that, following its investigation, he did not warrant credit. Givens repeatedly asked WGA to reconsider and each time WGA found that Givens did not warrant credit. Givens, Jacobs, Webb, and Westwind sued CBS in Los Angeles County Superior Court arguing that CBS breached its contract with them by not giving the plaintiffs writing and production credit for “Early Edition.” CBS removed the case to federal court. CBS filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the investigation by WGA had a collateral estoppel effect and that the issue was barred. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Graber, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.