Jacobs v. Jacobs

687 S.W.2d 731 (1985)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jacobs v. Jacobs

Texas Supreme Court
687 S.W.2d 731 (1985)

  • Written by Whitney Kamerzel , JD

Facts

Roy Jacobs (defendant) and Ellen Jacobs (plaintiff) were married and subsequently divorced. The trial court held that the Jacobses’ community-property estate was valued at approximately $1,300,000 and was to be equitably divided. However, a substantial amount of this value consisted of community-property reimbursement claims for time, effort, and other community resources used by Roy to increase the value of his separate-property company. The value of the reimbursement claims was not identified in the divorce decree. Roy appealed, arguing the reimbursement claims resulted in a mischaracterization of his separate property as community property. The court of appeals agreed with Roy because there was no evidence to support the reimbursement claims. Instead of remanding the entire case to the trial court for a new community-property division, the court of appeals tried to value the reimbursement claims and subtract them from the value of the community property. Moreover, the court of appeals remanded the case on the limited issue of eliminating the reimbursement claims consistent with the court of appeals’ valuation of those claims. Roy appealed, arguing the court of appeals should have reversed and remanded the entire case to the trial court for a new community-property distribution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ray, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership