Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Jacobson v. United States

United States Supreme Court
503 U.S. 540 (1992)


Facts

Jacobson (defendant) ordered some reading material from an adult bookstore. He later testified that he was surprised to find that some of the photographs were of young boys. Three months later, Congress passed a new anti-child pornography law that made it illegal for child-pornography to be sent through the mail. Over the next two and a half years, two government agencies investigated Jacobson’s willingness to break the new law. In an effort to determine if he would order pornographic images of children through the mail, the Postal Inspector fabricated four organizations and sent Jacobson materials from these organizations. The various materials presented the respective organization as an advocate of child pornography. Materials consisted of questionnaires, asking Jacobson what sort of pornography he enjoyed, as well as pamphlets and information criticizing the government for censorship and infringing on individual rights. Jacobson joined these organizations and filled out their questionnaires. The Customs Service, under the guise of yet another fake organization, sent Jacobson a brochure advertising photos of boys having sex. Jacobson placed an order that was never filled. Finally, Jacobson placed an order with one of the Postal Service’s fake organizations. He ordered a pornographic magazine showing boys having sex. Jacobson was arrested when the magazine was delivered. After his arrest, the only evidence the police found that indicated that Jacobson was interested in child pornography were the letters and brochures sent to him by the government. The judge instructed the jury on Jacobson’s entrapment defense. Jacobson was convicted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (O’Connor, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.