Jaffee v. Redmond

United States Supreme Court
518 U.S. 1 (1996)


Facts

Mary Lu Redmond (defendant), a police officer, shot and killed Ricky Allen during a dangerous encounter while she was on duty. Jaffee, the administrator of Allen’s estate (plaintiff), brought a wrongful death suit against Redmond, claiming that she used excessive force in the killing. At trial, the administrator questioned Redmond about counseling sessions she had had with a licensed social worker after the shooting. Redmond refused to testify about the sessions despite the district court’s order to do so. The district judge instructed the jury that there was no legal justification for Redmond’s refusal to answer the questions and that the jury could assume that the sessions with the social worker contained information unfavorable to Redmond. As a result, the jury found in favor of the administrator. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed, recognizing a federal psychotherapist-patient privilege. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Issue

The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,515 briefs - keyed to 85 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now