James City County, Va. v. Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
12 F.3d 1330 (1993)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
As water supplies in James City County, Virginia (plaintiff) became inadequate, the county planned to build a dam and reservoir across Ware Creek for a county water supply. The Army Corps of Engineers granted a permit, but the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) “vetoed” the permit on the grounds that the project would result in the loss of nearly 400 acres of wetlands and aquatic habitat and that the county had practicable alternatives. The county sued, and the court ordered the Corps to issue the permit, reasoning the county had no practicable alternatives. The Fourth Circuit affirmed but remanded to the EPA to decide whether environmental issues alone justified the veto. The EPA vetoed the permit a second time based solely on environmental considerations. The county again sued, and the district court again ordered the Corps to issue the permit. The EPA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sprouse, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.